
A few weeks ago in Nairobi, a viral debate broke out on TikTok and social media. Someone posted about delivery riders calling repeatedly for directions. Riders responded. Sellers weighed in. The...
A few weeks ago in Nairobi, a viral debate broke out on TikTok and social media. Someone posted about delivery riders calling repeatedly for directions. Riders responded. Sellers weighed in. The argument ran for days about GPS accuracy, landmarks, who should give clearer instructions.
It was a Nairobi conversation. But the frustration is not a Nairobi problem.
Walk through any city in Lagos, Dhaka, Jakarta, Cairo, or Bogotá and you will find the same scene. A rider on a motorbike, phone to his ear, trying to locate a person. A customer stepping away from a desk to guide someone to a gate they've described a hundred times before. A seller watching the clock, wondering if this delivery will complete or come back failed.
The details vary. The breakdown is identical.
Think about how delivery works in developed markets.
A courier arrives at a location. They leave the parcel. They leave. The customer picks it up when they're home that evening, the next morning, whenever. Nobody needs to be standing at the door at the exact moment of arrival. Nobody calls. Nobody coordinates.
That model works because there is somewhere safe to leave the parcel. A secure building lobby. A staffed desk. A trusted drop point that holds it until the person is ready.
Now think about how delivery works in most developing countries.
The rider arrives. They call. Because the parcel cannot be left outside. Theft is a real risk. It cannot be left with a random neighbor. There is no secure lobby, no trusted intermediary, no drop point. The only option is a direct handoff, person to person, right now, while the rider is waiting and the meter is running.
This is the real problem. Not GPS. Not directions. Not communication skills.
Delivery in emerging markets was built on the assumption that someone will always be there to receive. That assumption breaks constantly because people are at work, in traffic, in a meeting, somewhere else. And when the assumption breaks, the whole chain breaks with it. The rider calls. The customer doesn't answer or can't get there. The parcel returns. The seller gets a complaint. Everyone loses.
"Uko wapi? Nimefika. Kujia mzigo." The Swahili phrase at the center of that Nairobi debate exists in nearly every market where delivery is growing faster than the infrastructure supporting it. The words change. The phone call doesn't.
The instinct is to solve this with better maps, better GPS, more detailed order notes. These are fixes around the broken assumption, not replacements for it.
The broken assumption is that delivery requires the person to be present.
In markets where this assumption holds, where buildings have secure lobbies, where neighborhoods have trusted drop points, where leaving a parcel outside is safe, delivery is fast, cheap, and smooth. The person doesn't need to be there when the parcel arrives.
In markets where it doesn't hold, every delivery becomes a real-time coordination problem between a rider and a person. That coordination costs time, fuel, failed attempts, and customer trust. It is also the single biggest reason last-mile delivery costs stay high in emerging markets. The system is inefficient by design because it was designed for a different context.
The fix is not a better app. It's a physical network of trusted, secure locations across the places where people actually live. A place the parcel can go when the person isn't available. A place that is secure, accountable, and close enough to matter.
This is not a new concept. Pickup point networks have existed in developed markets for decades: convenience stores, post offices, locker banks, staffed collection points. They exist because someone recognized early that home delivery is expensive, unreliable, and time-dependent, and that a trusted location solves all three problems at once.
What's different about building that network in an emerging market is the constraint: you cannot use unstaffed lockers where security is uncertain. The location needs to be human. It needs to be trusted. And it needs to be everywhere, not just in commercial centers, but in the estates, markets, and neighborhoods where most people actually live.
That is what PickSpot Agents are. Existing local businesses, shops, kiosks, neighborhood stores, become verified pickup points for the people around them. When a buyer has a PickSpot handle, any parcel sent to that handle goes to their chosen agent location. The rider delivers to a fixed, known address. The customer collects when it suits them. Every handoff is secured by QR and one-time PIN.
No call. No coordination. No failed delivery because the person wasn't home.
Mobile money didn't improve the banking system that was failing people. It replaced the assumption that financial services needed physical bank branches. It built a new network, distributed through existing local businesses, that worked for the context it was operating in. The results reshaped entire economies.
The last mile delivery problem is the same shape. The question isn't how to make the current model work better in contexts it was never designed for. The question is what the right model looks like when you build for the reality on the ground. Cities without street addresses, neighborhoods where security needs a trusted human, populations that are mobile and busy and cannot be home for every delivery.
The answer is infrastructure that separates delivery from presence. A network of trusted local pickup points, dense enough to be convenient, secure enough to be reliable, distributed through the businesses that are already in every neighborhood.
That network is what PickSpot is building, starting in Nairobi, designed for every city with the same problem.